Bill Joys Why the Future Doesnt Need Us Free Essay Example, 750 words

ï » ¿ Why the Future does not Need Us Why the Future Doesn't Need Us provides us with the future’s interpretation in a very pessimistic manner. Bill Joy's depiction depicts how in future the robotic race will conquer the earth once technology advances greatly. The robotics will have their own mind, make their own judgments and thus eradicate the human race. From this title, it can easily be predicted that there is no future for the human race. Bill Joy debates the negative prospects of the technological advancements in nanotechnology, genetics development and the use of robots. The computers processing speeds exponentially growing in recent years and the development of novel inventions will supersede the speed of growth. The gigantic computing power might make the intellectual fictitious robot possible. Human beings and the robots will merge in an attempt to complete the industrial tasks. These changes might even lead to human replacements in these industrial tasks. These hazards also occur in nanotechnology and genetics scopes of life. The establishment of nanotechnology made possible development of electronics of molecular nanoscale. This technology will grow greatly in the subsequent two decades. We will write a custom essay sample on Bill Joy's Why the Future Doesn't Need Us or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Joy said that it is by far easy to make negative applications for nanotechnology as opposed to the more functional ones. He further articulated that, if we do not put the ethical issues of nanotechnology in mind, there is a high danger of destroying the earth’s biosphere that we all depend for survival. The development of genetic technology presently brought us numerous ethical issues. Bill Joy supposed that the general community is conscious of, and nervous about, genetically customized groceries, and appears to be declining the concept that such edibles should be allowed to be unlabeled. Bill’s apprehension was that genetic technology might give the authority to bad personality and aid them to perform disparaging act with an example being the White Plague. The price of employing GNR technologies to perform negative acts is being less than the NBC period is what Bill worries. While creating weaponry of mass destruction with NBC techno logy requires rare novel unprocessed materials and largely protected data with large-scale actions, the GNR technologies are abused easily. According to him, they will not need vast facilities or novel unprocessed materials but the knowledge is what will enhance their usage. This is knowledge provokes the human thought. Undeniably, the advancement of GNR technologies will alter our existence to a large degree. The development of genetic technology will treat today’s incurable diseases Nanotechnology will provide enormous industrial materials to be used in production of electronics. Humans will be freed from their places of work with the deployment of robotics to substitute human labor. This is a remarkable negative effect because human labor will be brought to extinction. Human labor is what most people depend on to make or earn their living as it provides employment. Some of Bills debates are not on point because there is uncertainty whether the expectations of the future a re pessimistic without the power to manipulate the development of GNR technologies. I do not suppose that there is abuse of GNR technologies just by being knowledge about it. A number of Bill Joy’s justifications of disagreement are sufficient. In addition, I doubt whether the future is that pessimistic if we do not manage the development of GNR technologies. Just as we require tools to develop mass destructive arsenal with NBC machinery, we also require equivalent tools for application of GNR awareness. High precision machinery is required to implement genetic and nano-technological advancements. I am in doubt of the future being so pessimistic with no ethics care in such fields. Bill Joy depicts that people may combine with robots hence development of new Borg similar species. We ask ourselves if this is the destiny of human evolution (Winston & Edelbach, 156). Bill’s representation depicts two alternating future representations putting in mind that the computer wi zards have progressed in coming up with intelligent machinery that can perform tasks as compared to human beings. These representations have a negative outcome to humans. This passage confers that humans will not be stupid enough to give all control to the machinery. This passage is not telling we willingly grant them authority, nor will they grab our power. The depiction does not ever talk about the robots being wicked and will destroy humanity. It articulates of our migrant under robot management until we will not succumb to the belief that robots are right. With the technology increasing, the society will become intricate and machines develop to be more intelligent. We will commence to let machines decide for us and not later from now, societal problems will be very complex. It is not probable for people to make clever judgments. Machines will be the definite solutions to our troubles, and almost immediately will take useful control. The second depiction centers on humans sustaining power over machines. The power over hefty machine systems will be in the control of the meager elite. At some point, these elites will posses better methods, and human beings work will not be required. It proposes that the stipulations of these elites being brutal will annihilate the mass of humanity. Conversely, their human nature will diminish birth rate to the extent of humans becoming extinct; hence, the world will be left to the elite. In conclusion, on assumption that the elite are gentle liberals, they would step up to guide humanity to a life satisfying every need and want, hence a life with no purpose. Works Cited Winston, Emmanuel, and Edelbach, Ralph. Society, ethics, and technology. Boston. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2012.